ВКР: Analysis of the development of the health resort industry in the Far Eastern Federal District

1.

Ablaeva Adile Serverovna

2.

Federal Districts of the Russian Federation

3.

2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
Central Federal district
341
331
305
300
281
North-Western Federal district
143
144
136
136
130
Southern Federal district
249
255
373
355
355
North Caucasus Federal district
170
156
168
167
170
Privolzhskiy Federal district
417
399
393
399
388
Urals Federal district
165
156
154
150
142
Siberian Federal district
247
236
226
222
199
Far Eastern Federal District
75
75
77
80
90
Crimean Federal District
98
126

4.

Table 1
The analysis of dynamics of the number of HRO (pcs)
in FEFD for 2003-2015

5.

Table 2
The analysis of dynamics of the number of
accommodated persons (man) in FEFD for 20032015 years

6.

Table 3
The analysis of dynamics of the number of beds
(places) in FEFD for 2003-2015 years

7.

Table 4
The analysis of dynamics of the number of rooms
(rooms) in FEFD for 2005-2015 years

8.

Table 5
Dynamics of income and expenses of HRO by
subjects of FEFD in 2015 year

9.

the harsh climatic conditions of the winter period,
low population density,
economic underdevelopment of the territory,
low infrastructure development,
lack of proper state interest in the development of
tourism in this region.

10.

11.

Proximity to developed countries that can increase the
growth of tourist flow to the far Eastern Federal
district: China, Japan, Singapore, USA, Canada;
The presence of unique natural and recreational
potential,
Implementation of Federal programs;
Simplification of tourist formalities and customs
procedures;
Interest of foreign investors in the health resort
industry of the Far East district.

12.

Thank you for your attention!